Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurism (website)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was } Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 04:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Futurism (website)

Futurism (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an "emerging" website which claims notability, but I was unable to find any independent sources, so it fails WP:WEB. GAB^Hello! 20:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator -- I agree with the comments below, and now think this that is article should be kept. GAB^Hello! 20:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 21:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - it has received sufficient attention from independent sources (see the article's references section) to be considered notable. Another indicator of this notability are the ~2,2 million fans of its facebook page. --Fixuture (talk) 22:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Featured by multiple other notable sources, and quite high readership circulation on regular basis. — Cirt (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.